tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27653305.post8770326802535655584..comments2023-04-27T13:08:14.726+00:00Comments on J7: The July 7th Truth Campaign Blog: J7 EXCLUSIVE: Peter Power Dorset Police Suspension & the DPP FileBridgethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04220942517267393608noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27653305.post-30114815794853976412008-03-13T20:45:00.000+00:002008-03-13T20:45:00.000+00:00The CPS has now confirmed that no prosecution foll...The CPS has now confirmed that no prosecution followed:<BR/><BR/><I>From: Freedom of Information Unit (FOIUnit@cps.gsi.gov.uk)<BR/>Subject: Freedom of Information Act Request (Ref1204)<BR/>Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2008 13:24:32 -0000<BR/><BR/>FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT<BR/><BR/>Further to your email dated 7 March, I can confirm that the CPS archive record shows no further action was taken and subsequently no CPS prosecution followed. <BR/><BR/>Yours sincerely <BR/><BR/>Miss R Baverstock<BR/><BR/>Information Management Unit</I>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27653305.post-74650657950863175472008-02-29T22:13:00.000+00:002008-02-29T22:13:00.000+00:00Peter Power said: "I retired after - not before - ...<B><A HREF="http://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/shady-7-7-terror-suspect-wanted-for-questioning-peter-power/#comment-260" REL="nofollow">Peter Power said</A></B>: <BR/><BR/><B><I>"I retired after - not before - the CPS (not the DPP) made a decision that no prosecution was required."</I></B><BR/><BR/>With reference to the file submitted to the Crown Prosecution Service following the police investigation into <A HREF="http://julyseventh.co.uk/j7-exclusive-peter-power-dorset-police-suspension.html" REL="nofollow">Peter Power's activities</A> while in the employ of the <A HREF="http://j7truth.blogspot.com/2008/02/j7-exclusive-peter-power-dorset-police.html" REL="nofollow">Dorset Police</A>, <A HREF="http://z13.invisionfree.com/julyseventh/index.php?showtopic=2577&view=findpost&p=13576715" REL="nofollow">the Crown Prosecution Service has stated</A>:<BR/><BR/><I><B>"I can confirm that from this record it would appear that the file was received by the CPS on or about 19th/21st July 1993. There is also an indication that a decision on how to proceed with this case was made on approximately 28th October 1993."</B></I><BR/><BR/>The <A HREF="http://julyseventh.co.uk/j7-exclusive-peter-power-dorset-police-suspension.html" REL="nofollow">Dorset Echo of 2nd September 1993</A> stated:<BR/><BR/><I><B>"A West Dorset senior policeman currently under suspension from duty is to retire early on medical grounds. Superintendent Peter Power (42) will leave the force on September 26."</B></I><BR/><BR/>26th September 1993 is 32 days before 28th October 1993, which would seem to suggest that Mr Power's "retirement", apparently on medical/health grounds unconnected with the police investigation, occurred over a month <B>before</B> the CPS reached a decision on how to proceed with his case.The Antagonisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01459201402366077472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27653305.post-45421096539120089402008-02-23T14:21:00.000+00:002008-02-23T14:21:00.000+00:00Hi lwtc247,Thanks for the heads-up on this. You...Hi lwtc247,<BR/><BR/>Thanks for the heads-up on this. You are to be commended for your <A HREF="http://lwtc247.wordpress.com/2008/02/12/shady-7-7-terror-suspect-wanted-for-questioning-peter-power/" REL="nofollow">bold and principled stand in response</A> to Power's comment.<BR/><BR/><I><B>Peter Power</B>: "I have previously accused you of libel and note that you continue to publish defamatory information that is also libellous. I retired after - not before - the CPS (not the DPP) made a decision that no prosecution was required. Remove what you have said or I will, without doubt, take action against you with no further warning."</I><BR/><BR/>Mr Power appears to be getting a little confused in among all the <A HREF="http://stefzucconi.blogspot.com/2008/02/wikiwar.html" REL="nofollow">crisis management</A>, <A HREF="http://julyseventh.co.uk/july-7-terror-rehearsal.html" REL="nofollow">back-peddaling</A> and <A HREF="http://antagonise.blogspot.com/2008/02/j7-exclusive-peter-powers-cv-fakery.html" REL="nofollow">endeavouring to cover-up</A> the missing three years of his working life. It is true that Power has threatened someone before, however that threat was issued to someone by the name of Chris Bollyn who took <A HREF="http://julyseventh.co.uk/j7-exclusive-peter-power-dorset-police-suspension.html" REL="nofollow">J7's original research</A> and turned it into something else entirely. You can read <A HREF="http://www.bollyn.com/index/?id=10374" REL="nofollow">Bollyn's article here</A>. <BR/><BR/>A few points to help clear this up. The Director of Public Prosecutions heads the <A HREF="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Prosecution_Service" REL="nofollow">Crown Prosecution Service</A> so, essentially, we are talking about one and the same body. The Dorset Echo of 23rd April 1993 claimed:<BR/><BR/><I>"He [Power] was suspended following an internal police inquiry earlier this year after which <B>a file was submitted for consideration to the Director of Public Prosecution</B>".</I><BR/><BR/>The Sunday Times on 8th August 1993, stated: <BR/><BR/><I><B>"The Crown Prosecution Service has been sent details of an investigation into a senior police officer with the Dorset force.</B> Dorset police confirmed yesterday that Superintendent Peter Power, the officer in charge of the west of the county, has been suspended on full pay since April but refused to outline the allegations against him."</I><BR/><BR/>The primary issue here is not whether it was the DPP or the CPS, for they are, to all intents and purposes, the same thing. <BR/> <BR/>The crux of the matter is instead the simple fact that neither the DPP nor the CPS have files submitted to them for consideration of good or public-spirited behaviour. Files are only submitted to the CPS/DPP by the police when they determine that they have sufficient evidence to successfully prosecute criminal activity. Indeed, the <A HREF="http://www.cps.gov.uk/about/dpp.html" REL="nofollow">CPS web site states</A>:<BR/><BR/><I><B>The Crown Prosecution Service is responsible for prosecuting criminal cases investigated by the police in England and Wales. </B></I><BR/><BR/>A secondary issue is the manner in which Mr Power has omitted from his curriculum vitae any mention of his nettlesome stint with the Dorset Police and his potentially criminal activity that resulted in his suspension, investigation and, ultimately, the submission of a file to the DPP/CPS.The Antagonisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01459201402366077472noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27653305.post-12702362869321123172008-02-23T09:43:00.000+00:002008-02-23T09:43:00.000+00:00Peter's popped up again here:http://tinyurl.com/yu...Peter's popped up again here:<BR/>http://tinyurl.com/yu82dh ,on my website. I'd be honoured if you took a look and spread the word.<BR/><BR/>TQ.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com